The Question of Through-tenons
For the next issue of Woodworking Magazine, we’re investigating the best way
to make through-tenons – a hallmark of early American furniture, Arts & Crafts
pieces and people who like to show off.
I’ve spent a good deal of energy investigating the joint personally. When I started
collecting Arts & Crafts furniture in 1990, I quickly became attuned to spotting
the joint in pieces for my collection.
Even better, I had a mentor with an incredible collection. Owen Riley was a photographer
at the newspaper where I worked, and he had been collecting Arts & Crafts furniture
for many years. His entire apartment was stuffed to the gills with the stuff. And
he took great pains to teach me the difference between the makers – I can spot an
L & J.G. tusk tenon over a Gustav Stickley tusk tenon from across a room.
And so I’ve always had a realistic view of how this joint appears in real-deal furniture
that now costs five or six figures.
Here’s the real truth: The craftsmanship is all over the place. Take a look at the
photo above. That’s a through-tenon on a signed Gustav Stickley slipper rocker from
my collection. All the through-tenons on the piece look exactly like this. Clearly,
they were made with some sort of boring tool, perhaps a drill press or perhaps some
form of spindle machine. Heck you can still see some torn grain on the surface of
the joint that indicates the rotation of the cutter.
No effort was made to square up the ends of the joint. No effort was made to round
over the tenon to match the radiused mortise. There’s just a gap that’s plainly visible
on the outside surfaces of the leg.
I always like to compare that joint to the through-tenons on my Charles Stickley arm
chair. Charles was one of the “lesser” Stickley brothers, and the craftsmanship and
style of his work is often derided by modern writers. The through-tenons on his chair
are perfect, as good as any high-class modern work in a gallery.
There’s no consistency by maker. Roycroft through-tenons? Raggy. Limbert through-tenons?
Not bad except for a couple overcuts – probably from a saw.
So what’s the pattern? Visibility. The more visible the joint, the more likely that
the maker went to great lengths to make it tidy. That seems like it should be obvious,
but that has not been my experience with modern work (especially my own).
My inclination is to make the suckers perfect. Why? Because I often have other woodworkers
snooping around my house, pulling out my drawers, turning over my tables and the like.
So how do you make these joints spot-on? I’ve used several methods, which we’ll be
exploring in the issue. For long and skinny joints, it’s hard to beat a highly-tuned
hollow-chisel mortiser (though I’m going to try). For squarish joints, it’s hard to
beat a template and a router.
And, in the end, it’s hard to beat wedging, which can expand a tenon into a loosely
fit joint. Or, if you’ve had a bad day, putty and a dark dark stain…..
— Christopher Schwarz
no comments yet.
Cross-browser rounded vector corners »« Another Fool Proof Finish? - Question of the Week
